PRD's response to Rivera's outrageous statements that questioned the decision of the Mexican Supreme Court in my eyes were highly measured: PRD's Ortega, to recall, kept his usual cool and noted that one "should be careful with words because deeming a constitutional right as deviant is serious."
What is the church's answer to this?
Reverend Valdeman: "It is clear to me, and clearer than ever, that the national PRD is the great enemy of the Church and a danger to the family."
What is one to make of this? How can one enter into a dialogue with the church, when the extremists have hijacked it, bent on unraveling any progressive move within the last 3-4 decades? How dare the church, which has been on the wrong side of history on almost every conceivable issue - from schooling for girls to suffrage for women to reproductive health classes in the classroom, to name but the tip of the iceberg - accuse the PRD of a "danger" to the family?
The statements made by Valdemar are worth a read. They are truly Palinesque in their twisting of reality, let alone their internally contradictory and twisted logic.
Palinesque: Michael or Sarah? :-)
ReplyDeleteGood note
Hehe, brilliant! I'll let you make that pick:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf1y9s73Nos